Picking the 6th Inner Core Member.
Vote needed.
The founders have disagreed about the appointment of the 6th Inner Core Member. As we are a progressive organisation we wish to promote a woman to the inner core. This is a big step and after they pass the 23 year qualification period for women, the inner core will get the chance to vote on their appointment.
However, should we consider the application of one female for the next 23 years or look at 2 or 3 potential applicants?
The identity (ies) of these women will remain secret for the time being
They will not know and neither will you
The Founders have spoken.
The inner core now need to vote in line with the proceedure as stated in the PIGS rules (detailed below).
5(ii) In the event of a founder disagreement in an inner core vote, then the vote is postponed for a period of one week. After such a period the vote will be taken again and the result will stand. In the event of a tie at this stage, then the most senior member of the mass P.I.G.S. organisation will have the casting vote. (See rule 6 for seniority in mass organisation).
Please restrict your voting choices to (a) one or (b) 2 or 3
3 comments:
Yeah I vote for one. You don't want them herding. You know what women are like when they herd.
But we're only admitting one whichever option wins. I vote option b (2 or 3) .
Then if it ever passes that more than woman is deemed worthy we get the best one. But perhaps a no herding clause should be added.
Right I'm changing my vote. I now agree with Mat - lets have up to 3 candidates.
Jimmy, I am very disappointed.
Post a Comment